Programming Languages That Are So Hard, They're Not Even Worth Learning - TechBandi
Connect with us


Programming Languages That Are So Hard, They’re Not Even Worth Learning



Difficult Programming Languages
Image by Freepik


In the expansive world of programming languages, a spectrum of complexity exists. While some languages are celebrated for their user-friendliness and versatility, others lie at the far end of the spectrum, notorious for their formidable intricacies. For aspiring developers, especially beginners, the question often arises: Is it worth the effort to dive into the abyss of the most challenging programming languages? This article will delve into the perils of learning exceptionally complex languages and shed light on why certain programming tongues may not be worth the toil.

The Pitfalls of Learning Exceptionally Complex Languages

Programming languages come in varying degrees of complexity, and immersing oneself in the most challenging can be akin to scaling a daunting mountain. While the idea of mastering an intricate language may seem alluring, it’s crucial to consider the potential drawbacks.

  1. Excessive Complexity Hinders Productivity: Extremely complex languages necessitate substantial time and effort for proficiency, potentially leading to decreased productivity and slower development processes.
  2. Real-World Practicality: In a professional context, the choice of programming language often hinges on project requisites and industry standards. Investing extensive resources in mastering a difficult language can be impractical and inefficient.

Top Programming Languages Not Worth the Effort

Here are some programming languages notorious for their extreme complexity and, for most developers, may not be the best choice:

  1. Brainfuck: Designed for minimalism, Brainfuck is notorious for its lack of practicality, often regarded as obfuscated code.
  2. Malbolge: Frequently dubbed the “Hello World” of esoteric languages, it’s incredibly challenging and serves little real-world purpose.
  3. INTERCAL: Created to be as different from conventional programming languages as possible, it’s more of a satirical experiment than a useful tool.
  4. Whitespace: As the name suggests, Whitespace consists entirely of whitespace characters, rendering it almost unreadable and unwriteable.
  5. Befunge: With its multidimensional code execution, Befunge introduces a level of complexity that perplexes even experienced developers.

Cases Where Learning Challenging Languages Can Be Beneficial

While these languages may not be worth the effort for most, there are exceptions:

  1. Job Specialization: In niche domains such as malware analysis or legacy system maintenance, proficiency in these languages can be valuable.
  2. Personal Challenge: For hobbyists and enthusiasts, conquering a difficult language can be an intellectually gratifying endeavor.

A Look at Easier Alternatives

For those seeking a more approachable entry into coding, numerous programming languages offer a gentler learning curve. Consider these easier alternatives:

  1. Python: Renowned for its simplicity and readability, Python is an excellent choice for beginners.
  2. JavaScript: Widely used for web development, JavaScript is beginner-friendly and versatile.
  3. Ruby: Prized for its elegant syntax, Ruby is an excellent language for novices.
  4. Java: With a substantial community and abundant learning resources, Java is a robust choice for beginners.


Choosing the right programming language is a decision not to be taken lightly. While the allure of conquering the most complex languages is enticing, it’s crucial to weigh the pros and cons. In a world where time and efficiency are paramount, opting for practicality often makes more sense. Your chosen language should be a valuable companion on your coding journey, not an insurmountable obstacle. Remember, the path to coding proficiency is a marathon, not a sprint, and the language you choose should empower you, not impede you.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *